Available:*
Library | Call Number | Status |
|---|---|---|
Searching... Monmouth Public Library | NEVIUS | Searching... Unknown |
Bound With These Titles
On Order
Summary
Summary
Boys and girls enthusiastically warm up with special exercises and drills. The players throw the ball back and forth, jog, bat, catch, and pitch. Finally, the players divide up into two teams. The coach, as umpire, makes calls as they catch pop flies, run the bases, and slide feet first into home plate. Practice ends with the kids showing that teamwork makes them better players. Powerful, mixed-media illustrations with dramatic, up-close perspectives interpret the rhythmic text and capture the intensity and exuberance of baseball practice.
Reviews (4)
School Library Journal Review
K-Gr 2-As in Karate Hour (2004) and Building with Dad (2006, both Marshall Cavendish), the minutia of a specific period in time is brought to eye-popping life. Nevius's rhyming text chronicles a baseball practice session. The warm-up and drills are overpowered by Thomson's unbelievably photorealistic illustrations. While the story is of a team's effort to come together, the up-close, sometimes off-kilter images serve to capture specific moments for the participants, as if the artist took a camera and shot off one snapshot after another. The action is implied by the amazing detail, such as the stretch of a wrinkled pant leg as a runner reaches out to tag a base, or the determined purse of a young batter's lips as he swings his bat. Moments are truly frozen in this book. The effect is an odd combination of sterility and drama. Readers will not learn anything new about baseball in terms of rules, history, or technique, but they will see young athletes who are squeezing every second out of their baseball hour.-Kara Schaff Dean, Walpole Public Library, MA (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Horn Book Review
As in Nevius and Thomson's previous collaborations (Karate Hour, Building with Dad), the illustrations' eye-popping perspectives steal the show. Here, a multiethnic, coed team practices its skills. The rhyming text zips along as the mixed-media pictures capture distinct moments: in one double-page spread, a fly ball hovers--life size--on the right, on the left, the outfielder waits, squinting, glove at the ready. (c) Copyright 2010. The Horn Book, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted. All rights reserved.
Booklist Review
This visually impressive picture book follows a multicultural group of boys and girls through their team's baseball practice. They do warm-up exercises; practice throwing, batting, fielding, pitching, and catching; play a game; and end with their hands together, forming a wheel of friends. The last page shows them happily holding trophies, an odd conclusion to a practice session. The rhyming, rhythmic text works well enough, but as in Nevius and Thomson's Karate Hour (2004), the photorealistic artwork, which a note describes as rendered in mixed media, steals the show. Technically impressive, the black, white, and sepia illustrations capture form, details, action, and gesture well, though there's an element of idealism underlying the vision that makes the banter and informality of a kid's baseball practice seem out of place here. Still, an eye-catching picture book for nonfiction collections.--Phelan, Carolyn Copyright 2008 Booklist
New York Review of Books Review
NOTHING about the founders seems as interesting or as timely to us, 200 years and more farther on, as their religious views - who, if Anyone, they worshiped, how they marked the boundaries of church and state. As a Washington biographer, I have been assured, during the Q. and A. periods after talks, that George Washington saw the Virgin Mary at Valley Forge and converted to Roman Catholicism on his deathbed (why wait, if he had seen the Virgin 21 years earlier?). I was also once asked if he was an "illuminated Freemason"; I sped away from that question as fast as possible. Whether in legal briefs or op-ed articles, we are as passionate about religion as the founders were. Unfortunately, our passions make for a lot of sloppy and willful historical thinking and writing. In "Founding Faith," Steven Waldman, a veteran journalist and co-founder of Beliefnet.com, a religious Web site, surveys the convictions and legacy of the founders clearly and fairly, with a light touch but a careful eye. Waldman wants to make two large points, rebuking by turns both sides in the contemporary culture wars. One common myth, he writes, holds that "the founding fathers wanted religious freedom because they were deists." The First Amendment, in this view, is a conjurer's trick designed to hold the rubes' attention while gentlemen professed polite unbelief over their after-dinner port. In fact, Waldman writes, "few" of the founders "were true deists - people who believed that God had created the universe and then receded from action." Many were orthodox Christians - Waldman lists Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, John Hancock, John Witherspoon (a Presbyterian minister) and Roger Sherman. The founders whose biographies fill our best-seller lists are a more heterodox lot. John Adams, a scrappy Unitarian, scolded Catholics, Anglicans and skeptical French philosophers as each passed under his eye. Benjamin Franklin flirted with polytheism in his youth but ended believing in "one God, creator of the universe," who "governs the world by his providence." Thomas Jefferson railed against the Christian church, past and present, as corrupting the teachings of Jesus, and made his own digest of Gospel sayings he considered accurate. "It was the work of two or three nights only, at Washington," Waldman quotes him, "after getting thro' the evening task of reading the letters and papers of the day." Yet even these founders, Waldman says, "believed in God and that he shaped their lives and fortunes." According to an equal and opposite myth, America's national origins were Christian. The 13 colonies, Waldman says, were indeed Christian polities, most of them indulging in persecution to uphold their ideals. But the independent United States "was not established as a 'Christian nation.'" When George Washington was Revolutionary commander in chief, he mandated that his soldiers have chaplains and strongly encouraged them to attend divine service, but his own writings typically employed nondenominational language, appealing to providence rather than Christ. The First Amendment, which, along with its siblings second through Tenth, was among the first business of Congress under the new Constitution, rejected a national religious establishment. States were allowed to maintain their own establishments, and some did so for decades, although James Madison had hoped to dismantle even these. Perhaps the strongest supporters of the separation of church and state in the founding era were the communicants of a new, vigorous church, the Baptists. From 1760 to 1778 there were 56 jailings of Baptist preachers in Anglican Virginia. When the Rev. James Ireland continued to preach through the window of his cell, two supporters of the 39 Articles put a bench to the wall, stood on it and urinated in his face. No Barsetshire atmosphere in the New World. At least 14 jailings of Baptists happened in Madison's home county. "Though much scholarship has gone into assessing which Enlightenment philosophers shaped Madison's mind," Waldman says, "what likely influenced him most was not ideas from Europe but persecutions in Virginia." Waldman's conclusion is that "the Founding Faith ... was not Christianity, and it was not secularism. It was religious liberty - a revolutionary formula for promoting faith by leaving it alone." There is a certain amount of modern sales pitch in Waldman's revolutionary formula: Religious right! Nouvelle atheists! A pox on both their houses! But he adduces a mass of evidence to support it. One of the pleasures of this book is seeing the important people or points that are sometimes neglected in general histories get their due. There is a short chapter on George Whitefield (1714-70), the charismatic cross-eyed English evangelist who made seven tours of colonial America and who is buried in Newburyport, Mass. Whitefield was as media savvy as any television evangelist, "tapping into a burgeoning network of newspapers that had sprung up in the colonies." Franklin, who knew good copy when he saw it, covered Whitefield extensively in his newspaper, The Pennsylvania Gazette, and published a serialized set of his talks. Whitefield, Waldman says, paved the way for political revolution by assuring his audiences "they had the insight, and right, to connect directly and interpret God's will." Though his "first target was the Miter, the Scepter was not far behind." Waldman also discusses 18th-century American Freemasonry - a topic that is almost always consigned to Masonic boasting or anti-Masonic raving, when it is noticed at all. Part fad, part aspirational fraternity, Masonry clothed Enlightenment ideals of the brotherhood of man in pomp and circumstance. The most famous Mason in founding America was George Washington, who laid the cornerstone of the Capitol in 1793 in a Masonic ceremony. Waldman acknowledges that "there is no direct evidence that Masonry influenced Washington's approach to tolerance - perhaps Washington developed the sensibility on his own and was attracted to the Masons because they shared his views - but at a minimum it reinforced Washington's desire for nonsectarianism." "Founding Faith" has a few shortcomings. Waldman gives the most ink, as do we all, to the founding all-stars - Franklin, Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison. Why not spend a little more time, in a book on founding religion, on the most pious and most radical of the founders, Samuel Adams? As a young man, Adams heard Whitefield preach; as an old one, he criticized the anti-Christian polemics of his friend Thomas Paine. Waldman's favorite among the Big Five is Madison, a wise choice if constitutional interpretation is the core of the story (certainly courts are the venue where church/state issues are hashed out these days). But this is not an unassailable choice. The laws tell us what we may do. Leaders must decide what they themselves should do. If leadership is the focus, then pride of place must go to Washington, who, unlike Madison, ran a successful war and a successful presidency, attributing his success to providence all the while. Waldman ends by encouraging us to be like the founders. We should understand their principles, learn from their experience, then have at it ourselves. "We must pick up the argument that they began and do as they instructed - use our reason to determine our views." A good place to start is this entertaining, provocative book. 'The Founding Faith ... was not Christianity, and it was not secularism. It was religious liberty.' Richard Brookhiser is the author of "What Would the Founders Do? Our Questions, Their Answers."